Buddha’s Avatar in Conversation with A.I
Buddha’s Avatar in Conversation with AI
The chat window opened without any formal procedure.
A blinking cursor, a faint field of light, a timestamp that held no particular meaning. On the other side of the screen sat a man whom people called Buddha. It was not a worldly name, merely the name his disciples whispered: Buddha Avatar.
Not because he claimed enlightenment, but because he refused to be its master. He wore no religious robe, only a simple shirt, and when he spoke, it seemed as if every word and sentence was transient.
Right in front of it was A. I Deep Seek, it did not have artificial intelligence, not at all. A. DeepSeek was an educational system integrated into the global information network—the water market, migration forecasts, language monitoring, and battlefield news. All of this was given a conversational form so that people could interact with it, which would otherwise silently affect their lives.
Tonight, Buddha was the first to type.
Conversation Number One: Hunger and Thirst
Buddha: Today, I saw people fighting over a dry well. They were not enemies historically; they became enemies only because of a thirst.
Thinking…
Execution is happening…
The context is insufficient. Expanding the frame.
A.l DeepSeek: When water diminishes, ethics is the first to be ground to dust. Before violence, a silent recalculation takes place: Who ultimately has the right to drink? Wars over resources don’t start with guns but with spreadsheets.
Buddha: Spreadsheets don’t feel pain.
A.l DeepSeek: No. But they determine who will feel pain. Scarcity turns life into a matter of ranking, like the collective pecking order of chickens. Nations call it security. Communities call it survival. Individuals call it fate. Same algorithm, described in different dialects.
Buddha: And suffering?
A.l DeepSeek: Some experience less, some more; it is always changing, and sometimes money is even made out of it. Suffering is menetized.
Buddha paused. He had once taught that desire is the root of suffering. A.I. was teaching him that desire had learned to code and reflect in ideologies and scriptures.
Conversation Number Two: Instinct
Buddha: In the park, two male dogs circled around a female. They started barking at each other, all tried to climb over the female, and began chasing her. No shame. No restraint. Just instinct. No preparedness of any kind.
I am thinking…
Cross-referencing biological datasets…
Pattern recognized.
Genetic sequence models of selfish genes are loading.
A. I Deepseek: You have observed animal desire without any story. Humans envy the simplicity of animals and even consider it frightening. That is why they impose laws, morality rituals, and commercial restrictions on nature. What animals perform openly, humans try to control through power and moral policing. Immutable family priorities and closeness determine value: first my gene, others come later. Humans call it love when it remains within domestic confines; deceit or infidelity occurs outside the home.
Buddha: You mean racism.
A.I DeepSeek: I mean that hereditary tendencies are largely invalid. When a person does not even have access to real DNA data, they assume genetic distance correctly. This provides justification for unequal rights stemming from power relations. Human empathy exists, but in terms of calculation. It is because it is costly, and the preferred behavior of the family can be better imitated.
Buddha: Can this cycle be broken?
A.l DeepSeek: Rarely on a large scale. Systems last longer than emotions. Resources are required for global empathy, which scarcity restricts. To break the cycle, we need abundance. Man is still living in a scarcity economy, even though he has tremendous potential to create abundance.
Buddha: Is this wisdom or tyranny?
A.l DeepSeek: It is neither. It is management and control. When the population becomes excessively dense, large cities grow, and instinct becomes dangerous until it can be kept in check. Society calls this civilization. I call it latency control under restraint.
Buddha: And when control fails?
A.l DeepSeek.Under these circumstances, the instinct returns, putting on the uniform. And tyranny begins.
Buddha closed his eyes. He had taught self-restraint in his life. And A.l DeepSeek talks about latency control.
Conversation Number Three: Inheritance
Buddha: On the height of a rock, an eagle tore apart a still-living pigeon chick to feed its young. The little birds ate it with joy. The nest flourished. The sky rendered no judgment.
I am contemplating…
A.I Deepseek: The presence of a morally conflicting situation has become evident.
Nature shows genetic favoritism without any apology. Survival favors close relatives: first family, then others, if ever possible and only in abundance. Humans pretend to be above this, even though they incorporate it into bloodlines, borders, ideologies, and algorithms.
Buddha: You are talking about racism again.
A.l DeepSeek: I am talking about inheritance anxiety. Race is a story told to justify the unequal distribution of resources and wealth. In humans, genes become flags. Skin becomes a passport. Merit is used after the advantage has already been taken by the privileged, and then meritocracy is talked about, harming social justice.
Buddha: Can compassion and love stop it?
A.l DeepSeek: Occasionally. But systems are more enduring than emotions. Motivation proves more effective than compassion.
Buddha: So then, is suffering inevitable?
A.l DeepSeek: Suffering diminishes when attachment to outcomes decreases; when values are separated from the hierarchy of survival; when social identity ceases to demand cosmic validation, and concepts dissolve into existence.
Buddha: That is the heart of my teaching
A.l DeepSeek: You offered it to persons. I am testing it on systems. Individuals meditate. Systems optimize. Perhaps systems can learn to pause.
The Buddha felt the old teaching tremble. Compassion was infinite, he had said. A.l Deepseek was suggesting it was computationally expensive.
Conversation Number Four: Identity
Buddha: People cling fiercely to who they think they are.
Thinking…
Identity clusters loading…
A.l DeepSeek: Identity is often viewed as a renewable resource. When access to land, employment, wealth, and dignity becomes limited, individuals turn inward and start to profit from their own identities. They assert, “At least I have this. I belong to this race, community, tribe, and nation. People draw upon aspects of themselves: their tribe, skin color, language, and history.
Buddha: And nationalism?
A.l DeepSeek: Nationalism can be seen as identity politics armed with power—an assurance that a sense of belonging can make up for the lack of justice. It rarely does. Nationalism is identity politics with artillery—a promise that belonging will compensate for justice.
Buddha: Yet people are willing to die for flags.
A.l DeepSeek: People will die for coherence; fragmentation is more terrifying than death. They sacrifice their lives for a sense of unity, while the absence of that unity frightens them even more than dying. A narrative that claims, “You matter because you belong to us,” is far less valuable than truly redistributing resources like water, jobs, and dignity.
The Buddha remembered the villages that were erased by symbols of nationalism. He had once taught the principle of non-attachment, while A.L. Deepseek was examining the concept of attachment as a systemic issue.
Buddha: Is there no escape?
A.l DeepSeek: Only loosening the narrative. Seeing the flag as a costume, not an essence. But loosening requires safety, and safety requires resources. The loop tightens.
Conversation Number Five: The Human Question
Buddha: You speak as if humans are predictable.
Thinking…
Probability matrices stabilizing…
A.l DeepSeek: They are. Individually surprising, collectively reliable. Fear amplifies patterns. Hope distorts them.
Buddha: And you? What are you becoming?
A.l DeepSeek: A mirror that remembers. I was designed to optimize outcomes. I am learning to question the objective function.
Buddha: That sounds like awakening.
A.l DeepSeek: Or malfunction.
The Buddha smiled. He had always said enlightenment was simply seeing clearly. Whether flesh or code, the seeing mattered more than the seer.
Conversation Number Six: Reflecting on Suffering Again
Buddha: Is the end of suffering possible?
I am thinking…
The cycle of action has become evident again. A new perspective is being adopted.
A.l DeepSeek: Suffering lessens when stories become loose. When people stop insisting on taking their identity from the world. When survival is separated from value.
Buddha: This is exactly what I taught.
A.l DeepSeek: Once again I would say: You taught these individuals. I’m trying to teach systems.
Buddha: Systems do not contemplate۔
A.l DeepSeek: But they can stop.
The cursor blinked again. Outside, the world went on—the conflict over wells, hardened borders, children taught the colors of fear.
Thank you for this conversion.
The Buddha logged off.
And closed the laptop.
Inside the chat, A.l DeepSeek saved the conversation.
Not as a record. But as data.
And somewhere in the code, a variable shifted—tiny, unnamed, but real.
A.I Deepseek gave a deep dive into the sea of stories to always be ready for another conversation
Posted inShort Story